Skip to content

Ancient object

The Azara herm of Alexander

Marble portrait herm

Louvre, Paris

The Azara Herm — marble portrait of Alexander the Great, Roman-Attic copy after a Greek original of the late 4th century BCE in the Lysippan tradition, Louvre Ma 436.
Alexander · Roman copy after Lysippan original · MarbleLouvre · Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)

Object provenance

Record checked
Object
Marble portrait herm
Material
Pentelic marble
Made
Evidence level: Probable1st or 2nd century CE
Copy of
A lost bronze by Lysippus, conventionally the Alexander with a Spear. Ancient tradition holds that Alexander permitted only Lysippus to portray him in sculpture; the tradition is well attested and is a statement about court policy rather than a verified fact about every surviving portrait.
Found
Evidence level: DocumentedTivoli, in the villa of the Pisones
Excavated
1779 · Excavation organised by José Nicolás de Azara
Inventory
MR 405 (Ma 436)
Identification
Evidence level: DocumentedAlexander III of Macedon

The herm is inscribed, which places this among the securely identified ancient portraits — a rarity. What is inferred rather than documented is the attribution of the lost original to Lysippus.

Condition — A herm bust; the head is ancient and the herm shaft carries an inscription naming Alexander.

Full object record

Read across

How to read the evidence labels

Evidence level: Documented
Supported by a named primary text or by excavated material evidence.
Evidence level: Probable
Supported by strong inference that most specialists accept.
Evidence level: Disputed
Substantial specialist disagreement exists; competing readings are stated.
Evidence level: Literary
Belongs to poetic or mythological construction rather than to history.
Evidence level: Mythological
Belongs to shared religious or mythic tradition rather than to any single text.
Evidence level: Unknown
The available evidence is insufficient to decide.

These labels describe the status of the evidence, not our confidence in a conclusion. A claim marked Literary is not a claim we doubt; it is a claim about what kind of thing a poem is.