Skip to content

Classical Sparta (4th century BCE)

Agesilaus

The last great king of Sparta

Lifespan · c. 444 – 360 BCE

Why Plutarch reads him

Plutarch reads Agesilaus as a study of personal excellence in a declining state — a Spartan king of the old discipline, lame from birth, plain-living, obedient to law, devoted to his city, whose private virtues Plutarch genuinely admired, and whose energetic wars nonetheless helped exhaust the Sparta he served. The platform reads him, with Plutarch, as the case in which a leader's character and his city's interest pull apart: Agesilaus was very nearly the model Spartan, and Sparta declined on his watch.

Character: the disciplined king

Plutarch's portrait is unusually warm. Agesilaus kept the austere Lycurgan discipline when other Spartans were abandoning it; he was modest in his habits, devoted to his friends, obedient to the ephors and the law even when king, and personally brave into old age. Xenophon, who knew him, wrote an admiring memoir that Plutarch drew on. The platform reads this favourable portrait as deliberate and instructive: Plutarch wants the reader to see a genuinely good man, so that the question of why his goodness did not save his city lands with full force.

The political significance

Agesilaus led Sparta at the height of its post-war supremacy and into its collapse. He campaigned brilliantly in Asia against Persia — and was recalled when Persian gold raised enemies against Sparta in Greece, a turn the platform reads under the long Greek–Persian entanglement. His later policy, driven partly by personal animosities, helped provoke the Theban war that ended in the catastrophe at Leuctra in 371 BCE, after which Sparta never recovered. The platform reads the tension Plutarch builds: a king of real virtue whose judgement, narrowed by Spartan parochialism and personal feeling, served his city's decline rather than its preservation.

The lesson Plutarch draws

Plutarch pairs Agesilaus with Pompey — two great commanders, much loved, whose careers ended in their states' disasters. The platform reads the lesson under leadership and character: that personal virtue, even real and disciplined virtue, is not sufficient for statesmanship if it is not joined to wide and impartial judgement, and that a good man may serve his country's ruin while never once betraying it. Agesilaus is Plutarch's case that character is necessary but not, by itself, enough.