theme
The classical inquiry into philotimia — the love of honour and distinction — and into when it makes a public life and when it deforms it.
theme
Plutarch's governing conviction that the exercise of power reveals and is shaped by character — that what a leader does with authority is finally a question of who he is, tested in the small act as much as the great one.
theme
Plutarch's central concern with how private character bears on public office — whether a good man makes a good statesman, what the public arena does to virtue, and how the leader's inner life governs his use of power.
theme
Plutarch's reading of leadership as an expression of character rather than technique — the qualities that make a leader followed, the discipline of self-command, and the example a leader sets as his most powerful instrument.
theme
The classical and historical inquiry into how polities lose the institutions, habits and characters that once held them — and into whether the loss is reversible.
philosopher
Greek biographer and essayist of the Roman imperial period — author of the Parallel Lives and the Moralia, and the main classical conduit for the European study of character through history.
philosopher
The brilliant, beautiful and treacherous Athenian whom Plutarch made the type of the ungoverned natural gift — a man of dazzling ability and boundless ambition who served, and betrayed, Athens, Sparta and Persia in turn.
philosopher
The proud Roman patrician whose courage saved his city and whose inability to bend turned him against it — Plutarch's study of a great nature ruined by an ungoverned temper, the Roman counterpart to Alcibiades.
philosopher
The richest man of the late Roman Republic, whose wealth bought political power but not the military glory he craved — Plutarch's study of avarice and ambition, dead with his army at Carrhae against Parthia.
philosopher
The dazzling, mercurial son of Antigonus — brilliant general, master of siege warfare, and study in the instability of fortune, whose spectacular rises and falls made him the Hellenistic age's great example of greatness without steadiness.
philosopher
The Spartan admiral who won the Peloponnesian War — building a fleet with Persian gold, destroying Athenian sea power at Aegospotami, and taking Athens itself — then revealing in victory an ambition and arrogance that troubled even Sparta.
book
Plutarch's biography of Julius Caesar, paired with Alexander — a study of supreme ability and unappeasable ambition, and a principal source through which later Europe read the fall of the Roman Republic.
book
Plutarch's biography of the Roman orator and statesman, paired with Demosthenes — a sympathetic but unsparing study of eloquence and vacillation in the Republic's last generation, and of the vanity that shadowed real greatness.
theme
How states lose wars they could have won — overreach, the abandonment of a sound strategy, the triumph of wishful thinking over hard calculation — read through the Athenian catastrophe in Sicily and the collapse of Periclean grand strategy.
comparison
Plutarch's pairing of two great natures turned against their own cities — the brilliant, faithless Athenian and the proud, unbending Roman — a study of how ungoverned gifts become a republic's most dangerous enemies.
comparison
Plutarch's most famous pairing — the two supreme men of action of the Greek and Roman worlds, conquerors of boundless ambition, set against each other as a study of genius, power and the limits a free state can bear.
comparison
The two greatest Romans of their generation, allies turned rivals, whose civil war destroyed the Republic — the audacious populist against the establishment's golden general, and the contest that decided Rome's fate.
comparison
Plutarch's pairing of two wealthy men whose foreign expeditions ended in annihilation — the Roman destroyed by over-reach at Carrhae and the Athenian by over-caution at Syracuse — a study of how riches and bad judgement wreck armies.
comparison
Plutarch's pairing of two beloved, victorious commanders whose careers ended in their states' disasters — the Roman who lost to Caesar and the Spartan king who outlived Sparta's greatness — a study of great soldiers and failing judgement.
essay
An interpretive reading of Alcibiades as the embodiment of ungoverned ambition in the Peloponnesian War — his gifts, his serial betrayals, and his role in the ruin of Athens.
essay
An interpretive reading of Plutarch's Life of Alexander — its famous method, its portrait of a great nature tested by power, and what it tells us about the relation of genius, self-command and unbroken success.
essay
An interpretive reading of the comparison of Alexander and Caesar — two conquerors of genius, the ambition each embodied, and the decisive difference between conquering a foreign empire and mastering one's own state.
essay
An interpretive reading of Plutarch's Life of Caesar — its portrait of supreme ability joined to limitless ambition, and its account of the Republic's fall as the working-out of a single great character.
essay
An interpretive reading of Plutarch's character-driven account of the fall of the Roman Republic, and of the general claim that republics die when the virtue their constitutions presuppose drains out of the men who run them.
essay
An interpretive reading of the Athenian Sicilian Expedition of 415–413 BCE — the decision, the divided command, the refusal to retreat, and Thucydides' account of the disaster that doomed Athens.
essay
An interpretive reading of philotimia — the love of honour — in Plutarch's Lives, and of the fine line between the ambition that drives a leader to serve his city and the ambition that drives him to subvert it.